logo

Do researchers think the impact of nationwide protests on COVID-19 infections may be less than first feared?

Wednesday, June 24, 2020
By Mikayla Campbell
YES

Scientists don't yet see signs that nationwide protests that began at the end of May accelerated the spread of the coronavirus. “It’s somewhat difficult to disentangle cases directly arising from the protests versus just opening up of society in general" in prior weeks, a Harvard epidemiologist told Scientific American. Mostly young protestors could in turn transmit the disease to older, more vulnerable family members, so an effect may yet be seen.

A study by San Diego State University found that “the protests had little effect on the spread of COVID-19 for the entire population of the counties with protests during more than two and a half weeks following protest onset.” They theorize that the protests may have on balance kept more people at home, offsetting increased risk of transmission in the streets.

This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTOR
Between 2020 and 2022, under close editorial supervision, Gigafact contracted a group of freelance writers and editors to test the concepts for fact briefs and provide inputs to our software development process. We call this effort Gigafact Foundry. Over the course of these two years, Gigafact Foundry writers published over 1500 fact briefs in response to claims they found online. Their important work forms the basis of Gigafact formats and editorial guidelines, and is available to the public on Gigafact.org. Readers should be aware that while there is still a lot of relevant information to be found, not all fact briefs produced by Gigafact Foundry reflect Gigafact's current methods and standards for fact briefs. If you come across any that you feel are out of date and need to be looked at with fresh eyes, don't hesitate to contact us at support@gigafact.org.
FACT BRIEF BY
facebook
twitter
email
email