logo

Is it unconstitutional for states to close businesses during COVID-19?

Thursday, June 4, 2020
By Dan Fitzgerald
NO

The 10th Amendment gives states broad powers to impose restrictions when there is a justifiable public interest. In an often-cited 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, the Supreme Court upheld the state's requirement for mandatory smallpox vaccination. Courts have typically acceded to public health restrictions similar to those imposed by states and local governments during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic.

The American Bar Association notes the current pandemic may present some unique questions. Measures to restrict interstate travel for health reasons, for instance, haven't been common. Public health authorities and officials have wide latitude but may face continuing court challenges. "Judicial review, guided by the Constitution and Supreme Court precedents, will have the last word," the ABA said.

This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTOR
Between 2020 and 2022, under close editorial supervision, Gigafact contracted a group of freelance writers and editors to test the concepts for fact briefs and provide inputs to our software development process. We call this effort Gigafact Foundry. Over the course of these two years, Gigafact Foundry writers published over 1500 fact briefs in response to claims they found online. Their important work forms the basis of Gigafact formats and editorial guidelines, and is available to the public on Gigafact.org. Readers should be aware that while there is still a lot of relevant information to be found, not all fact briefs produced by Gigafact Foundry reflect Gigafact's current methods and standards for fact briefs. If you come across any that you feel are out of date and need to be looked at with fresh eyes, don't hesitate to contact us at support@gigafact.org.
FACT BRIEF BY
facebook
twitter
email
email