logo

Are there consequences for China under international law because of its initial handling of the coronavirus?

Wednesday, September 2, 2020
By Allegra Taylor
NO

China’s initial timing in alerting the rest of the world to the coronavirus threat appears to be a violation of World Health Organization rules. In 2005, WHO established requirements for member states to report “any event of potential international public health concern” within 24 hours of assessment, and to continue reporting new developments.

WHO rules, like many international treaties, don't outline any processes for claiming compensation or imposing penalties. Former WHO legal consultant David Fidler says it is unlikely other member states would take any action against China, as they wouldn't want to set a precedent that could be used against them. A Finnish researcher notes that a "tacit understanding seems to prevail among states," making the prospect of any action "bleak."

This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTOR
Between 2020 and 2022, under close editorial supervision, Gigafact contracted a group of freelance writers and editors to test the concepts for fact briefs and provide inputs to our software development process. We call this effort Gigafact Foundry. Over the course of these two years, Gigafact Foundry writers published over 1500 fact briefs in response to claims they found online. Their important work forms the basis of Gigafact formats and editorial guidelines, and is available to the public on Gigafact.org. Readers should be aware that while there is still a lot of relevant information to be found, not all fact briefs produced by Gigafact Foundry reflect Gigafact's current methods and standards for fact briefs. If you come across any that you feel are out of date and need to be looked at with fresh eyes, don't hesitate to contact us at support@gigafact.org.
FACT BRIEF BY
facebook
twitter
email
email